George Sakkal
CUVISM
“Cognitive Unconscious Visual Creativity”
About CUVISM Fine Art
CUVISM (Cognitive Unconscious Visual Creativity), is a mind based, visual creative decision making process unconsciously providing all artists with the ability to create Fine Art. It was discovered by George Sakkal during a ten year period of research into the field of neuroscientific cognitive psychology. His finding repudiates the era of Postmodernism and Marcel Duchamp reasoning. It proves irrefutably that both the era and Duchamp’s theory and practice of art to be untrue.
The discovery of CUVISM and its application in the creation of Fine Art should not be mistaken to be simply another “ism” or art movement. It is much more. Rather, it is a breakthrough of extraordinary artistic significance. For the first time, it identifies the creative decision making process of the human mind, a natural capability that all artists have and have always possessed. It was this inherent, unconscious, mind based creative capacity that early humans called upon at the very beginning that guided the hand of the first prehistoric visual artists who painted on cave walls in Europe over forty thousand years ago. It was the inherent creative behavior at play responsible for all of history’s art periods and movements throughout the centuries beginning with mankind’s first creative response. Its application is responsible for the Fine Art you see here.
CUVISM engages by way of a search and discover methodology. It totally rejects Postmodern’s predetermine readymade ideology; a conscious mind preconceived conceptual art theory, a theory and practice Sakkal has proven to be fallacious and damaging to the creative mind of all artists who subscribe to its use. To learn more about CUVISM, acquire George Sakkal’s new book, WHOSE TRUTH– WHOSE CREATIVITY?, Why Postmodern Art Theory is a Cultural Damaging Mistake and How Neuroscience Can Prove This, A 21st CENTURY ART MANIFESTO. The book, available at most bookstores and from Amazon.com, provides scientific evidence proving Postmodern art reasoning is wrong.